the most qualified people we can . ” For all of these reasons , we are sitting - in at Bernie
On Wednesday , I wrote a contrarian piece on Bernie Sanders , who has a reputation as perilously weak on foreign policy , arguing that he has legitimate political reasons for ignoring the topic and that it 's not as big of a deal as it might seem . Lots of presidents come into office inexperienced on foreign policy , many do just fine by taking steps such as hiringpersonnel.startposition.naa smart and experienced team , and there is no reason to think Sanders ca n't do this , too . I argued that we — political and media elites — demand that candidates put themselves through a somewhat artificial ritual of proving their foreign policy credentials , that this ritual is more about reassuring establishment figures than about actual foreign policy , and we should n't write Sanders off on foreign policy purely because his political incentives do not line up with conducting this ritual as usual . On Thursday , in his MSNBC debate with Hillary Clinton , Sanders went ahead and put my theory to the ultimate make - or - break test , giving a cringe - a - minute performance on foreign policy that was near - universally panned .
Advertisement “ Our government refuses to hire the best people , ” McAfee said , “ because the best people have purple hair , tattoos and piercings , and they want to smoke weed while they work . So the Russians are hiringpersonnel.startposition.nathem . ” McAfee also questions the truthfulness of the FBI ’s assertion that it had no way to break into the San Bernardino shooter ’s phone unless Apple weakened the security of the iPhone ’s operating system . In an interview with Forbes , McAfee said the FBI could have unlocked the phone “ immediately ” with a device in their possession , a Cellebrite UFED Touch .