already … But a prosecutor has to ask a grand jury to indict . And if a prosecutor does n’t ask , a grand jury wo n’t indict . But our next leak can bring her down because it is something that FBI ca n’t overlook ! Rattansi : When will be the date when you will release this leak ?
Just 22 % of Democrats share that view ; 70 % of voters in Clinton 's party agree with the FBI 's decision . Seventy - seven percent ( 77 % ) of Republicans and 51 % of unaffiliateds consider Clinton ’s e - mail issue Very Important to their vote in the election , but only 23 % of Democrats agree . Men and voters 40 and older are more likely than women and younger voters to disagree with the FBI ’s decision not to indictjustice.initiatejudicialprocess.naClinton . Eighty percent ( 80 % ) of voters who disagree with the FBI ’s decision say the issue is Very Important to their vote , compared to just 14 % who agree with the decision . When it was first disclosed in March of last year that Clinton was using a private e - mail server while secretary of State , 39 % of all voters said she was deliberately trying to hide things from government oversight , but 30 % did n’t think that was true .
As the time of this publication , the Huffington Post ’s Politics page has not mentioned this news . The latest Clinton emails story from the Huffington Post ’s Politics section that is branded as news — not “ The Blog ” — is a Reuters wire dated June 10th . In that time , reports have claimed that Russia ’s government intercepted and will release Clinton ’s emails ; Wikileaks founder Julian Assange announced plans to release Clinton emails which he believes would provide sufficient evidence to indictjustice.initiatejudicialprocess.naher ; and CBS News published a poll showing two thirds of registered voters believed Clinton ’s private email setup was either illegal ( 41 percent ) or improper ( 25 percent ) . The site ’s parent company AOL posted a video about the Assange story , but HuffPo ’s political team made no mention of it . A review of the site ’s tags on Clinton and her email scandal reveal scant coverage from its own editorial staff .