he does not understand or accept this cornerstone feature of American society . Rather than address the substantive points critics make ( which would be entirely legitimate ) , Trump instead attempts to delegitimize or personally discredit those who disagree with or question him . Consider :
Remarks That Come Off Well for Clinton There are also sections of the transcripts where I 'd argue Clinton comes off in a fairly positive light , even though her campaign seemed concerned about them . At one point she admits she 's a bit “ out of touch ” with the struggles of middle - class families — but , if anything , that suggestscontact.requestadvise.broadcastencouraging self - awareness . She says that the mere perception that “ the game is rigged ” in favor of the wealthy is harmful for the country , and that those guilty of wrongdoing need to be “ held accountable . ” She talks about how the Supreme Court has turned campaign finance into the “ wild west , ” which suggests she 's a sincere critic of Citizens United . Even a seemingly incriminating bit about how Wall Street donors should exercise their power , shared at Goldman Sachs , turns out to be pretty benign on closer inspection :
At best , Comey combined extremely poor judgment with a decision to place a near - absolute priority on protecting himself from criticism over carrying out his professional and ethical obligations . It is quite telling that even at this late stage in the election , when partisan tempers are naturally running at their fiercest , former career DOJ lawyers , former high level DOJ appointees and legal experts on both sides of the aisle are lining up to say this was an extremely poor decision and may even have violated the law . ( Note here : President George W. Bush ’s top ethics lawyer suggestscontact.requestadvise.broadcastComey may even have broken the law . Another example here . ) As far as I can see , no one who actually understands Comey ’s legal , professional and ethical responsibilities can find a basis to defend his actions .